Fair enough. I guess my main problem (and that of the Courts should this ever go to Trial) would be figuring out the difference between the genuinely evil - by which I mean those who knew, and profited personally from hiding the truth, those who didn't know the truth but behaved abominably anyway, those in the middle ground who being respectable citizens who 'just followed orders', didn't do anything wrong personally, and assumed that someone else knew better than them.
It is if the action being taken appears to be innocent at that time. For example, giving a vaccine to someone is normally regarded as a life enhancing medical intervention. Or restraining a delirious patient at risk of harming themselves or others.
It only becomes criminal if the injector knows that the substance is harmful.
If you draw that dividing line where people put their own interests before that of humanity then that comfortably nets virtually everyone above dogsbody level in the NHS, politics and the media. It includes most management tiers in big business too. Think of the courts as a precursor to Hell. They all deserve to go there and it's not for us to anguish over the finer points of why, when the priority is that they should be punished for their murderous behaviour.
I spent much of my career in the NHS and Local Government undoing the mistakes of the past. I mean, in bricks and mortar terms, I helped to close a lot of ancient asylums and helped to replace them with more humane, local forms of community-based support for damaged and vulnerable individuals. That is a cause I believed in then, and still do now,
By the time I and my fellow workers arrived on the scene, the original founders of this massive Gulag of Asylums were dead and buried, but their ghosts still echoed in many a long and bleak corridor.
They genuinely thought they were doing good, but they actually caused immense damage to many hundreds of thousands of very vulnerable people. ~ but time and context changes.
It's a painful subject: maybe one day I will write more about it, but maybe it is better to draw a veil over the horrors.
What a brilliant article Laura. We did not have to be doctors, scientists or economists to realise what was going on. Just a little research, critical thinking and common sense told us to stay away from the mRNA.
The unvaccinated very vilified and now the vaccinated want to blame us for not warning them about the dangers of mRNA. You really couldn’t make it up. Forgive, forget, amnesty …..NEVER
Thanks Jan, I was truly amazed at the wilful ignorance of some very 'educated' people. After watching the brilliant Great Wall of Cunts my anger dial returned to DEFCON 1 as I remembered how absolutely evil some public figures were. No amnesty ...ever.
Fair enough. I guess my main problem (and that of the Courts should this ever go to Trial) would be figuring out the difference between the genuinely evil - by which I mean those who knew, and profited personally from hiding the truth, those who didn't know the truth but behaved abominably anyway, those in the middle ground who being respectable citizens who 'just followed orders', didn't do anything wrong personally, and assumed that someone else knew better than them.
Following orders is never an excuse …..Nuremberg
It is if the action being taken appears to be innocent at that time. For example, giving a vaccine to someone is normally regarded as a life enhancing medical intervention. Or restraining a delirious patient at risk of harming themselves or others.
It only becomes criminal if the injector knows that the substance is harmful.
Lots of gradations of guilt.
The drug pushers have got to be worse than an individual drug addict.
If you draw that dividing line where people put their own interests before that of humanity then that comfortably nets virtually everyone above dogsbody level in the NHS, politics and the media. It includes most management tiers in big business too. Think of the courts as a precursor to Hell. They all deserve to go there and it's not for us to anguish over the finer points of why, when the priority is that they should be punished for their murderous behaviour.
I spent much of my career in the NHS and Local Government undoing the mistakes of the past. I mean, in bricks and mortar terms, I helped to close a lot of ancient asylums and helped to replace them with more humane, local forms of community-based support for damaged and vulnerable individuals. That is a cause I believed in then, and still do now,
By the time I and my fellow workers arrived on the scene, the original founders of this massive Gulag of Asylums were dead and buried, but their ghosts still echoed in many a long and bleak corridor.
They genuinely thought they were doing good, but they actually caused immense damage to many hundreds of thousands of very vulnerable people. ~ but time and context changes.
It's a painful subject: maybe one day I will write more about it, but maybe it is better to draw a veil over the horrors.
Amnesty? On what grounds? Ignorance is no defence.
Everyone involved, in whatever capacity, from A to Z, should be charged in Law with:
A. GENOCIDE.
B. CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY.
C, TREASON.
Absolutely
What a brilliant article Laura. We did not have to be doctors, scientists or economists to realise what was going on. Just a little research, critical thinking and common sense told us to stay away from the mRNA.
The unvaccinated very vilified and now the vaccinated want to blame us for not warning them about the dangers of mRNA. You really couldn’t make it up. Forgive, forget, amnesty …..NEVER
Thanks Jan, I was truly amazed at the wilful ignorance of some very 'educated' people. After watching the brilliant Great Wall of Cunts my anger dial returned to DEFCON 1 as I remembered how absolutely evil some public figures were. No amnesty ...ever.
She doesn't want her conscience twinged one little bit, because she knows what a nice person she is.